Viacheslav Bielinskyi vs Kane Bonsach Ganley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the recent form of the last six months, Ganley has achieved a second serve point win rate of 42.81%, while Bielinskyi has secured 42.53% of their second serve points. This statistic shows a high correlation to match prediction accuracy. In terms of return stats, Ganley has won 47.39% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Bielinskyi's 45.83%. When it comes to first serve returns, Ganley and Bielinskyi have won 29.81% and 34.85%, respectively, indicating Bielinskyi’s slight edge in return games.

Under pressure, Ganley has saved 55.86% of breakpoints during recent play, overshadowing Bielinskyi’s 52.05%, which acts as a significant stat for in-game betting. When considering overall match performance in the past year, Ganley holds a win rate of 60% (W/L 36/24), while Bielinskyi shows a superior win rate of 66.67% (W/L 34/17).

Regarding surface performance, both players have their highest career win percentages on clay. Ganley boasts a 63% win rate (W/L 66/39) on clay, while Bielinskyi has achieved a win rate of 61% (W/L 95/61) on the same surface. However, their worst performances are found on hard surfaces, with Ganley at 61% (W/L 28/18) and Bielinskyi at 25% (W/L 1/3) on indoor hard courts.

In the context of tournament levels, both athletes frequently compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level. Ganley has played most of their matches here with a win rate of 60% (W/L 36/24), whereas Bielinskyi shows a slightly higher win rate of 68% (W/L 34/16). Encompassing the last year, the average rank of Ganley's opponents was 358.47, compared to Bielinskyi's, which averaged 490.16, suggesting Ganley faces stronger competition.

If this match should venture into a deciding set, Ganley has a 54% winning percentage in such scenarios over the past year, while Bielinskyi surpasses this with a 60% win rate. The ability to convert breakpoints is another critical aspect, with Ganley achieving a conversion rate of 34.43%, slightly trailing Bielinskyi, who converts 37.5% of their opportunities.

Given the statistics, Bielinskyi appears to be the stronger contender in this matchup, having demonstrated superior performance in key areas such as breakpoint conversion and deciding set victories.